knuX

see you there!

Xrb isn't a cheater, neither are the majority of regular players you accuse almost every time you play the server The other players you mentioned who were cheating are kicked every time they're reported

I don't see your behaviour as an attack or harmful at all, I just see it for what it is and that's to provoke a little. I agree you can't control someone else's decisions but I don't believe you're not aware and that's just based on what I've read and seen. If you write things like "I heard he's got unbanned early" or something in chat, and then he's playing on your team on the server, it raises suspicion as I said and it's not the only example I'm definitely not acting in some way because of how you first was, it's not that deep for me lol but you wanted to keep mentioning the ban and provoking here and there and it gets a reaction eventually But anyway, we've got an understanding both ways now, onwards

Hi Semik I think the issue firstly is that you came to the discord/server at the start with a point to prove. I don't know you other than after this person's ban you joined discord and played regularly. You was mostly interested in provoking a reaction from the start, with some of it aimed at me which was strange. It's not against the rules to wear a tag, I'm not bothered, but I'd say if you just wanted to play and get on with things you wouldn't choose it. It's not the problem, it just paints a bigger picture. Mocking in discord, commenting on admins in game, tag, making comments about this person is getting unbanned soon, etc. That isn't someone who "respects admin decisions" or only plays the game for themselves. Writing things like "I've heard this person has been unbanned early" or similar, when that person is avoiding ban and playing tells me that you know they are. If that's not true, then maybe you shouldn't make so many attempts to speak about a player who has already been banned if you really just want to play as you say This person often tries to avoid ban and often joins when you're on. I did notice a few times that it seemed like you knew who it was, and it was only because of that that I knew who it was too. Considering that and the above it seems to me highly unlikely that you're unaware of it until I kick. If I'm wrong, sorry, but I'm only acting on what I've seen and I'm definitely not doing it without reason If you think it's a personal thing, it's not. You've trolled to provoke a reaction and then when you get one, you act shocked. It was clear you had an issue with me/others from the start, despite us not knowing eachother, and I think because of that I didn't feel like I should give you the benefit of the doubt. I think the kick last night was only a little unfair because it seemed to come out of the blue. I apologise for it not because I think it was wrong, but because I know it can be frustrating when it happens that way. But your provoking from day one equally came out of the blue just because you see me as the reason your friend is banned, which isn't the case

Hey unsigned Every game I see you play atm you're getting multiple warns with mortar. And just because you're not getting warn doesn't mean you're not spawnkilling. Today on Braundorf you 2/3 times set up Mortar at bottom of stairs on side and was shooting it into Axis spawn exit. No warns but you couldn't be more intentional if you tried. https://teammuppet.com/home/forums/topic/20794-teammuppet-spawnkill-areas/

Hi Knardo I spoke to Dutch who says it was just a mistake and he hit you once. At first I agree with you, looked like a TK but looking at different camera angles there's clearly an allied player to your right who you run past without seeing. This player shoots you and (I guess) Pure Dutch hits you once to finish you off by mistake. I can see how you might of thought this was a pure TK though. Also I don't see WDS looking for anything particular here

I think this is too preferential to ever happen, like making people play the way you want to play until they're "allowed" to play how the game is meant to be played. It's also not practical and will stack the defending teams, because for 5-6 minutes it's just target practice for them The only time I see it end this quick is when attack is very stacked or the defending team has players who are fixed to a spot looking for easier kills. Example for Braundorf once Allies have flag and gate. Axis camp the gate but Allies all switch to CP. Axis don't move back to OBJ because rather get easier kills at gate. There's no rule to say you have to go back and defend OBJ but if you choose not to then you'll have to accept the map might end quicker I agree, it's a shame when good map ends fast but that happens infrequently and if you're defending but don't care about OBJ you can always change your position/play slightly and make the map last longer yourself. Or if you're in a very good attacking team, move over to defending to even the teams and make the game last longer

Only thing I can say is SK is very hit and miss. It's not always about a specific spot you hit, but if you give damage to a player in an area you shouldn't. So you could hit a mortar and only give 1hp damage to someone who's in the SK area and you will get warned. So you can see how close it is

@Danimalthis change was made on the beginners server so different to what we play

Agreed! I think the counter argument is that if Axis wanted they can take the exit from spawn that goes towards West guns but if, for example, east has been planted that route is redundant.

I agree map already seems well balanced Would this type of bonus be better only when there's not much time on clock? Example: 1 minute left on clock, allies get first crate and get extra minute to try and win game. This would help making map a bit more exciting. But I don't think for example: 7 minutes on clock, allies get first crate and get extra time really helps the map. Don't know if it's possible though to add this where it only gives extra time depending on how much time is left

Was the spawns on Frostbite ever changed to make it more even? I've not seen it won by axis in a long time and more often than not is over within 4-5 minutes

Only positive so far of this version is it's something different to what's played every day. But the novelty wears off very quick The negatives are allied snipers are almost impossible to see. Personally, my FPS is about 30% less than on original version, so I imagine casual players are same or even worse. Though I quite like some of the terrain for hiding and sneaking the bushes are overkill. The tank doesn't really add anything to the game either, just annoying repaired/damaged announcements. I actually didn't even notice there was additional allied objectives, I'm sure when allies won it was just radar parts to truck? Might have missed something!

Keep it as it is now As Lost says very it's difficult for allies tbh. Lots of stages and none are easy, not even cp Also just adds interest that you can get an extra 3 mins with just one gold

🕶️

-Frostbite Agree but only when the server has low numbers i.e 6v6. When it's 20v20 frost is a "winnable" map for allies and there's many almost impossible for allies with those numbers, so it helps balance - Reduce the nades from some classes who have higher amount of nades available. So for example if a class has 4 nades, change it into 3 for example. This would help to make it (hopefully) a less of a nade festival on some closed range maps like for example Braundorf. Disagree because there needs to be some incentive to play other classes. It's already a thankless job being eng+smg for example. At least one benefit is more nades? When medic is already OP it seems only fair to negate it by helping other classes. I feel like this one could be helped overall if panzer/mortar was the class reduced as they're the real overkill and nades are just the added annoyance to them - Dont allow the class Soldier Panzer to have SMG aswell. This is ridicolous overpowered Definitely or at least reduce the recharge speed

🕶️

Insults towards me and others because his team got beat in public chat/private messages. High SR so a regular but don't know who. Blurry pics because I couldn't get screenshot working (must be cos I'm old idiot) 😧 https://ibb.co/RhKPcQR https://ibb.co/XZpcmG5 https://ibb.co/cXK6Tc8 https://ibb.co/HnRW9VM https://ibb.co/9th8KHC https://ibb.co/LRH8vBW

I didn't get kicked or warned for any of the logs you posted from other days so they're irrelevant to the post I've made. Only reason I can see for putting them here is because the actual reason for a 1 day ban was strange and over excessive? Anyway, language will improve and I won't bother calling out what I see as admin abuse as there's no objectivity anyway

Ok two team kills, again in a crazy objective room with 20 v 20 play, can you check how many times I was team killed by that player? Flo kicked me because someone said I TK them. I come back, explain, banned for 1 day I'm speaking specifically to certain players in most of those logs who are usually playing along with it i.e. Thomas paine and another American guy I was talking to. It's also completely without context in other examples i.e. Kexy asked that I should be banned because I was spamming team voice commands too much. Pull that log up from a minute earlier to what I said and you'll see that. Clearly I'm not writing to Kexy out of the blue, I'm writing cos he mentioned me first. Massive cock comment is almost certainly to Dubard because we say it to eachother every game. The only one there that is probably out of anger was Liana and I shouldn't of wrote that like that. 99% of what I've wrote there is taking the piss and certainly not out of anger lol. "brain dead axis/allies" is talking about my team, that I'm on lol, and a part of XD No different to anyone else saying moaning about their team almost every game saying useless or whatever else. All the same, the reason for the 1 day ban was poor and logs show that. If you're going to show logs of me interacting with players who I play with regularly then you should show both sides of the log! Anyway, noted on the language. Rules are rules.

"Not defensive" yet admin who wasn't even there comments on it. And admins will continue to over react with certain people and bans if when you point out their overreaction they all rally around each other like this If you read my post I've never once said "I didn't do this" / "I'm completely innocent" etc etc so how can you say I'm blaming others? I said exactly what I did do and I wanted someone to look into how that warrants a ban. I said the word c*** and was warned an hour before. I made a teamkill. Someone said I killed him 5 times (who has checked logs? No one? Of course ;)) and I was kicked. I come back and ask why and told because I'm toxic and swearing and team killing. I attempt to explain/find out and I make the "sly remark" and I'm banned 24 hours. My only mistake was saying the word c***. It wasn't making an accidental team kill and it wasn't writing "I can play and argue at same time". Was a ridiculous ban and I'm sure a LOT less will go unbanned simply because this time it was an overreaction. Me coming to make a complaint about an admin means I'm called: "a wise ass", "another player who thinks we OWE him anything", "kindergarten is over", "kid", "if you cant handle better not come back and play elsewhere" etc etc. Like I said, I'm making the issue because admins like to hold others accountable without any accountability for themselves. Issue is over. I wanted to clarify that the only reason I got banned was one harmless pisstake sentence and that's exactly what happened 🤷‍♂️

The thing that tells a lot is how defensive you've all gotten over it Servers perfectly fine. Admins make mistakes and it's human error, but apparently the place on the forum where you point that out is actually just a chance for you all to reaffirm you make no mistakes.

Well lately I fill in the time as I work from home with ET but couldn't today ...:D I get it must be an annoying job to admin when you're trying to play. But admins hold other people accountable without any accountability themselves. 24 hour ban for saying "I can play and argue at the same time" is ridiculously excessive and I'm pointing that out on a place where things like that should be pointed out. Unsurprisingly other admins agree that a one day ban is fair for saying, again, "I can play and argue at the same time" XD

You're all telling it's only a game, get over it etc then saying be careful with replying back with a smart remark or whatever because we just might ban you a day But thanks for accepting and clarifying. Make a silly remark back like "I can play and argue at same time" and you can be banned a day for it if an admin doesn't like you 👌 It's less me caring about the ban, it's more pointing the hypocrisy of the ban and then the weak justifications for it

I didn't say I followed every rule, are you ok there Lost? What I'm asking is where's the rule for being banned a day for making a "smart remark" that I can play and argue at the same time.